In the habits of fragmentary treatment and erratic frequency characteristic of this blog – especially when I find myself here on Saturdays – we continue the analysis of whatever vaguely market-related subject happens to capture my attention within an indeterminate period previous to writing. This time, it’s Ayn Rand.
I alluded to Ein some weeks back as the posthumous perpetrator of a petty mindcrime against a former acquaintance of mine. Still an acolyte, Rand simply convinced him to light candles in front of his own mirror rather than the Pieta.
Those memories were evoked by a randomized turn-of-the-dial listen to conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck during the morning commute: what I heard was veneration of Rand, Atlas Shrugged and WSJ Op-Ed writer Steve Moore for his 01/09/2009 piece “‘Atlas Shrugged’: From Fact to Fiction in 52 Years”. That column’s abject paucity of trenchant analysis, highly selective treatment of AS and Randian heroine worship were simply terrible. Beck’s total lack of cognizance that the object of his adulation uniformly averred ethical premises – as sine qua non for the success of capitalism - I’m certain he’d find repugnant was embarrassing; but brought to my attention a fomenting undercurrent I’ve noticed among pundits on the Right and marginalized self-styled philosophers and…traders: that Ayn Rand was magnificently prescient, a grand prophetess and first-rate philosopher who had all the answers half a century ago.

Goddess Ayn, Progenitress of the Objectivist Faith
I am not an irrational Rand-hater; I know better: nothing would be easier for an Objectivist interlocutor to belittle and neutralize in their customarily supercilious manner. And yes: Rand’s critique of statism carries important observations. She was intellectually formidable and a talented writer (though agonizingly loquacious and not gifted) and a fair philosopher in some regards.
But in other areas (for her, those areas that mattered most), I think she fared quite poorly: epistemologically (UGH!), ethically (GASP!), logically (BLEH!), even (a)theologically (SHRIEK!). I’ll not go into it, unless someone prefers that I did; but I hesitate to here, because I don’t invite nor do I accept invitations to engage in what amounts to the interminable pissing contests so typical of philosophical pedants on the Internet.
Perhaps traders don’t care about all of that: they’re simply content to appropriate from and make lists of Rand’s pithy little truisms a la Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil in support of their chosen profession. As a recent, high-profile example, take Santelli’s “At the end of the day, I’m an Ayn Rand-er” comment during his one of his recent rants. Really, Rick? Just what are you actually talking about?
Maybe intellectually irresponsible, but good because while I’m not out to alienate or anger anyone reading (mostly traders), I’m also going a bit out of my way to convey that as a formerly intensive student of the above philosophical sub-disciplines, I find most of the content of Rand’s oeuvre to be atrocious, and the quasi-apotheosis to which she has been subjected by her superficial admirers and obsessive Objectivist lackeys to be loathsome. If you’re a big fan of Rand’s “novels” and non-fiction works, think of yourself as adherent of Objectivism, think Leonard Peikoff (or David Kelley, for that matter) are nigh-unto-infallible, believe implicit subscription to Rand’s ideas would revivify our politico-economic system, or are any other variant on the hopeless-sophist-Rand-devotee archetype, “obsessive Objectivist lackey” probably means you.
This all means that as of this moment I’m inaugurating a 30 minute cessation of the Eulogy to lament the decline of the market, which has brought about government intervention (about which I’m ambivalent) and the secondary effect of a resurgence in the popularity of Rand’s work. Foreclosures, layoffs, and now, perhaps worst of all: increased sales of The Fountainhead by those who will never read it, or who will read it cover-to-cover and then cradle it in their arms as they sleep at night. I guess we can blame all this on Obama, too.
Now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, I’ll go back to enjoying a beautiful afternoon.
Lament over.
You second hander, you!
Comment by The Lonely Trader — March 7, 2009 @ 11:33 pm
My sentiments exactly. I’ve written about Rand’s “philosophy” (a title many so adamantly proclaim for her works, but I hesitate to affirm) elsewhere.
I followed her ideas for two weeks. Read a ton of her work, fiction and non-fiction alike. Then I began thinking about it in application to the real world, and decided she needed to apply some rigorous hygiene to her understanding of the world.
Fuck her popularity. It’s sickening.
As for BGE, I’d rather read Nietzsche any day. At least he has literary talent, humor, a sense of doubt, and an encouragement to think for yourself.
I don’t want a Randian God. That’d be nearly as bad as Communism.
Comment by complacentpanda — March 7, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
Why am I not surprised to see Lonely here?! LOL!
Lonely, still not over Dr Brett’s post?
Comment by Jules — March 8, 2009 @ 9:48 am
CP, I totally agree. Jules, no I’m not over Dr. Steenbarger’s post and in fact I re-read my response to him on Second Handers just so that I could indulge in a little anti-Rand sentiment. I’ve stopped frequenting Daily Speculations because it sickens me like it does CP. And I’ve also stopped frequenting Dr. S’s blog for that and other reasons. But I’m sure Andrew is just as sick of me harrassing him on his blog, so I’ll bugger off now…but one last word, if I may. These folks are legion. Over here in my neck of the woods, quite a few of the wealthier conservative celebrities and business people have little study groups organized by the society in Santa Monica. It’s almost like Invasion of the Bodysnatchers. Real human beings are dropping like flies, their eyes are turning red, yada yada yada.
Comment by The Lonely Trader — March 8, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
Sorry Andrew. I really will bugger off. Just had to throw in one last link for your readers:
http://www.noblesoul.com/orc/critics/personal.html
Comment by The Lonely Trader — March 8, 2009 @ 2:20 pm
[...] The Lonely Trader on March 8, 2009 Randian apparatchiks have taken another one on the chin over at AndrewUnknown. While I can’t speak for AU and he would probably hate me for it, I will say that I share his [...]
Pingback by Randian apparatchiks take another one « The Lonely Trader — March 8, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
Lonely,
You’re really starting to feel like my long lost twin…
Andrew,
I’m still waiting for my reply. NOT hinting! LOL!
Comment by Jules — March 8, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
Yes lonely trader I hate Daily Speculations too. Those “color hue frequency and intensity- deviations in patterns of the barnacle frog” type articles really turned me off. Yes, let’s make a model of this in the “R” programming language then we will make sense of the world and have a grand encompassing f**king theory and make ourselves kings of the world to be worshiped by all. Vic, the tosser that he is, lost everyone’s money twice.
I even chucked vic’s books in the garbage and I didn’t drop them off to a used book store because I don’t want anyone else to read his crap.
the mises blog (Austrian economist) is what I switched to.
Comment by mick — March 14, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
A, I likey von Mises too. Likey likey.
Comment by The Lonely Trader — March 14, 2009 @ 7:10 pm